This snapshot is currently making its rounds in Facebook
pages. And many people are aghast with this type of question and criticise it
as against the spirit of 1Malaysia.
To the masses that feed on sensationalised issue and unable
to think beyond the typical knee jerk reaction, this question was deeply riled
as a racial and political plot to promote the much maligned ‘Ketuanan Melayu’
dogma.
If people would dare to apply their common sense and step
back and breathe for awhile, the question posed was in the context of Malayan
Union and the struggle of Malayans against their British oppressors.
Obviously the exploits of Datuk Onn Jaafar was learned by
all of us and kids these days are not excluded from learning the history
of Malaysia.
Try answer the question please.
Done? What have you answered if you were Onn Jaafar? What
would you do in order to maintain the status quo of the Malays at that time in
the face of being colonised formally by the British through the Malayan Union?
Don’t know? Are you not Orang Malaysia? Why are you
offended with this type of question in the first place?
It is part of history.
The snapshot above is from a History subject. It is not
a subject about 1Malaysia or current affairs or current political studies.
This is History education.
I wrote sometime back which greatly emphasised this exact issue:
History as a subject has two pronged objectives. One, to
instil patriotism into the heart of every citizen from their childhood
stage. Two, as source of knowledge on their surroundings and how they
perceive their world.
In America, History was a touchy subject for the people
especially with the advent of multiculturism among its people. With the influx
of foreigners and the calls for equality among the afro-american movement,
history as a subject was a sensitive issue indeed.
For example, how do you reconcile the fact that George
Washington, the founding father of United States of America, has many black
slaves and treated them harshly?
How can one see Abraham Lincoln as one of the greatest
President the United States had ever had but at the same time he ‘supported
projects to remove blacks from the United States’ and said that ‘blacks could
not be assimilated into white society and rejected the notion of social
equality of the races’?
Multi-culturism pose a big threat to the learning of a
country’s history because history in the eyes of each community living in
a particular country is different from one another.
Was the Great Settlement of the Mid West by the white
colonials in America a great human achievement for the whites? Or was it a mass
extermination of the native Red Indians and their way of life by the europeans?
So what if George Washington owned slaves? So what if
Abraham Lincoln was racist?
Each and every American out there reveres them both as the
founding father and a great leader based on their achievements alone and what
good they had brought to the Americans even centuries after they had passed
away.
In other aspects, the native Americans in the USA are very
patriotic regardless what happened to their people in the past.
Back in Malaysia, we hear so many negative opposition from
the people who are against the subject of history made compulsory in schools. This
is precisely because their views came from the racial angle.
All the prejudice, the stereotyping, the paranoia are the
by-products of segregated education they experienced in their early
childhood. At the very least, their views were contaminated by the very people
that champion the need to segregate our children.
In the end, history is being promoted by these clustered
group of people as evil and should not be taught to our children. We see so
many unsavoury characters in the cyberspace trying hard to re-write history
based on fiction and malicious motives.
In any case, like how the Americans are accepting their
history, Malaysians must accept their country’s history from the eyes
of Orang Malaysia.
The need for racial posturing when it comes to history must
be stopped. Only desperate politicians would look through the racial lense and
try to skew history to further their agenda for power. People must not look at
history as if it is a disease that must be eradicated. - Full article here
